Measuring Congruence of Ranking Results Applying Particular MCDM Methods

نویسندگان

  • Jurgita Antucheviciene
  • Algimantas Zakarevicius
  • Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
چکیده

The aim of the current research is to measure objective congruence (incongruence) of the results obtained in a process of multiple criteria analysis when applying different MCDM methods. The methodology for evaluation of ranking results is developed on the ground of a case study of the redevelopment of derelict buildings as well as on composed experimental tasks. Fuzzified COPRAS, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods are applied for ranking the alternatives. Calculation results are evaluated by applying mathematical statistics methods. A methodology for measuring the congruence (incongruence) of the relative significances of alternatives is proposed.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluation of Ranking Accuracy in Multi-Criteria Decisions

The paper analyses the problem of ranking accuracy in multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The methodology for measuring the accuracy of determining the relative significance of alternatives as a function of the criteria values is developed. An algorithm of the Technique for the Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) that applies criteria values’ transformation t...

متن کامل

Considerations regarding the Choice of Ranking Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods

Various methods, known as Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDM), have been proposed to assist decision makers in the process of ranking alternatives. Given the variability of available methods, choosing an MCDM ranking method is a difficult task. There are key factors in the process of choosing an MCDM method such as: (i) available time; (ii) effort required by a given approach; (iii...

متن کامل

Constructing linguistic versions for the multicriteria decision support systems preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation I and II

The environmental impact assessment (EIA) is a real problem of multicriteria decision making (MCDM) where information, as much quantitative as qualitative, coexists. The traditional methods of MCDM developed for the EIA discriminates in favor of quantitative information at the expense of qualitative information, because we are unable to integrate this latter information inside their procedure. ...

متن کامل

Applying ER-MCDA and BF-TOPSIS to Decide on Effectiveness of Torrent Protection

Experts take into account several criteria to assess the effectiveness of torrential flood protection systems. In practice, scoring each criterion is imperfect. Each system is assessed choosing a qualitative class of effectiveness among several such classes (high, medium, low, no). Evidential Reasoning for Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis (ER-MCDA) approach can help formalize this Multi-Criteri...

متن کامل

ranking the branches of Insurance using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and MCDM Methods (A Case Study of Parsian Insurance Company)

Insurance companies are one of the most important economic institutions in each country and support other economic institutions and their proper functioning has a significant role in boosting the economy. The purpose of this research is Ranking the branches of Parsiyan Insurance Companys using CFA and MCDM Methods. The sample used, includes 30 Parsian Insurance Branches. Also, experts in the in...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Informatica, Lith. Acad. Sci.

دوره 22  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011